photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
All Cameras >> Nikon >> Nikon D100

Nikon D100 SLR Digital Camera Sample Photos

u37/equipment/upload/24297997.nikonD100.gif
Marketed: 21-Feb-2002
Megapixels: 6.1
Random Nikon D100 Samples from 218070 available Photos more
g5/66/374766/3/68235008.fVicGV9y.jpg u45/pompapa/medium/29416992.DSC_0038034.jpg g4/11/299211/3/64352721.hUqOKfhj.jpg g6/53/350253/3/73140081.WyIv721l.jpg
g6/66/374766/3/82123977.sIbEybkl.jpg u13/murraybowles/medium/38633952.5863.jpg g2/71/579571/3/65497439.SGAcIlQt.jpg v3/99/267099/3/50108767.DSC_0116.jpg
u42/bmcmorrow/medium/40669805.yemen4161.jpg u38/aziz/medium/24837867.webDSC_3545.jpg u49/tack623/medium/36813119.NewFolderImg20041125_0025JPEGof.jpg u26/nividhia/medium/19285908.DSC_6307.jpg


Comments
J Ponces18-Mar-2013 14:29
Rob, what do you mean by 'better'? Generally yes, But I would definitely say the D70 is better! I bought one for my daughter instead of a D100....
Rob Craftsman30-Jul-2012 21:31
Does anyone else agree that the D80 is better?
air ambulance20-Jun-2012 20:51
LOVE the shot with the leaves.
SuperFoods25-May-2012 10:18
I love the D100. Takes great photos.
simontander04-Nov-2011 13:02
A classi cone, maybe Nikon's last great DSLR before they got all fancy. I had to re-register, just to say there used to 800,000+ images last time I was here, What happened?
Guest 15-Jan-2008 14:05
New List
Professional Digital SLR Camera
1. Nikon D3
2. Nikon D2Xs
3. Canon 1Ds Mark 3
4. Canon 1D Mark 3

Semi Professional Digital SLR Camera
1. Nikon D300
2. Nikon D200
3. Canon 5D
4. Canon 40D
5. Pentax K10D
6. Fuji S5 Pro
7. Canon 30D
8. Nikon D80
9. Nikon D40x
10. Canon 400D
Dave Beedon19-Jul-2007 21:28
My first digital camera was a D100, bought in September 2003. It served me well for three years, then over a period of about two months the exposure controls became slightly unreliable. In October 2006 it "died": it set exposures according to whatever mood it was in; manual mode became completely unusable. (I explain the experience here:http://www.pbase.com/listorama/image/68120954 .) The D100 was replaced by a D80, whose features and ease of operation are much better than those of the D100. This can be an expensive hobby.
Guest 23-Apr-2007 19:04
Still use this camera, see lots of these in nature reserves, and it should see me through another couple of year.
Guest 26-Mar-2007 01:18
DEAR SHANNON,

RE: SWIFT TRANSFER OF US$11 MILLION INTO YOUR ACCOUNT

MY NAME IS MR KOFFI UMARU. I AM THE REGIONAL MANAGER OF ECO BANK INTERNATIONAL GHANA IN THE WESTERN REGION OF GHANA. I GOT YOUR INFORMATION FROM A FRIEND WHO IS A MEMBER OF OUR TRADE MISSION. I WRITE YOU THIS PROPOSAL IN GOOD FAITH. I AM 42 YEARS OLD MARRIED WITH TWO LOVELY KIDS.

I AM A DEVOTED CHRISTIAN AND A MAN OF PEACE. I HAVE PACKAGED A FINANCIAL TRANSACTION THAT WILL BENEFIT YOU AND I. AS THE REGIONAL MANAGER OF THE ECO BANK TERNATIONAL GHANA. IT IS MY DUTY TO SEND IN A FINANCIAL REPORT TO MY HEAD OFFICE IN THE CAPITAL CITY ACCRA AT THE END OF EACH BUSINESS YEAR. IN THE COURSE OF THE LAST YEAR 2006 BUSINESS REPORT. I DISCOVERED THAT MY REGION IN WHICH I AM THE MANAGER MADE 11 MILLION US
DOLLARS ($11.000.000.00) WHICH MY HEAD OFFICE ARE NOT AWARE OF AND WILL NEVER BE AWARE OF.

I HAVE PLACED THIS FUNDS ON WHAT WE CALL ESCROW CALL ACCOUNT WITH NO BENEFICIARY. AS AN OFFICER OF THIS BANK I CAN NOT BE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THIS MONEY. SO MY AIM OF CONTACTING YOU IS TO ASSIST ME RECEIVE THIS MONEY IN YOUR BANK ACCOUNT AND GET 20% OF THE TOTAL FUNDS AS COMMISSION.

THERE ARE PRACTICALLY NO RISK INVOLVED. IT WILL BE A BANK TO BANK TRANSFER; ALL I NEED FROM YOU IS TO STAND CLAIM AS THE ORIGINAL DEPOSITOR OF THIS FUND WHO MADE THE EPOSIT WITH MY BRANCH SO THAT MY HEAD OFFICE CAN ORDER THE TRANSFER TO YOUR DESIGNATED BANK ACCOUNT. IF YOU ACCEPT TO WORK WITH ME I WILL APPRECIATE IT VERY MUCH. REPLY ME THROUGH MY PRIVATE EMAIL BELOW IF YOU THINK WE CAN WORK TOGETHER SO THAT WE CAN GO OVER THE DETAILS. CONTACT ME IMMEDIATELY AND ONLY THROUGH THIS EMAIL ADDRESS (koffiumaru@24.com)

THANKS IN ADVANCE AND MAY GOD BLESS YOU AND YOUR FAMILY.

YOURS TRULY

MR KOFFI UMARU
Guest 11-Mar-2006 01:23
After some time, and having my new D-200 I have to say that the D-100 is a great camera, a bit too slow, but unless you don't have to make high speed photography it is perfectly fine, Since the last posting I don't know how many photos more I have made, but quite a few and it still works perfectly well if we exclude a bit of a contact problem with the WB knob it has fullfilled all the expetatives I had of this camera and more, and though now I mainly have it retired I still keep it as a second camera or as a backup one for what ever may happen with the D200.
I also agree with what Alfred Arzt sais quite a bit, I even and say that I did an exhibition of photos that were 100x80 and it standed quite well the quality though I shot it in JPG "high"... anyway I recognize that transforming it in BW as I did also helped to keep the pixels in an apparent small size.
Well, for me the D100 was the welcome to a new photographic era, the digital one, and it has been a good school and a good camera during all these years that I have had it.
Guest 16-Feb-2006 00:29
Love my D100 and F100. Everything I need!!!
Alfred Arzt09-Feb-2006 12:27
For me it was a very good camera. I had it 3 years till i got my d200 one moth ago. Had a lot of published pictures with it, for exapmle lot of page 3 girl pictures in Austrian Newspapers:http://www.pbase.com/artalf/black__white.
Made also very good big prints: size 50x75cm out of d100 raw files, they are briliant. High iso is good enogh up 1250 iso. 1600 iso is a bit noisy, more than in most modern DSLRS of today, but 800 iso is very good. lots of d100 pix in:http://www.pbase.com/artalf
Guest 07-Feb-2006 11:30
Still in use and very good results. Bettered only by costly SLRs.
Guest 30-Oct-2005 11:23
Had mine since it was first released and it's still running strong. Was a great investment.

Cory
www.pbase.com/bamburg
Guest 31-Jan-2005 05:57
It's the first I hear about the CCD overheating? Is Xabier talking about continuous use? From what I've read, Canon and Olympus have bigger problems with auto-focus (AF) than Nikon. The D-100 is a great camera. For professionals it is without a doubt better than the light-weight, consumer-oriented, marketed-into-popularity D70.

About AF: Many photographers would be better at focusing manually than even the latest AF technology standards.

The biggest gripes I have with AF (digital) SLR's is that, (1)the manufacturers seem to refuse to produce compatible manual focus lenses for the auto-focus cameras, and that, (2)there is no AF or MF standard prime lens (mass-produced and light 33mm f1.4 in Nikon) for the smaller digital sensors.
Guest 23-Nov-2004 10:55
Well, I can say several good and bad things about it.
The good ones are:
It is quite a bit stronger then it looks like at first hand. I bought one of the first ones that arrived here in Spain, and by now I probably have done arround 300.000 shots without a problem. (some collegues have had problems with the shooter).
It has many features in the menu and it is complete PRO. camera and it's resolution is not bad, aldo it is recomendable to shoot with High JPG, RAW or TIFF for maximum performance.
Bad Things:
Nikon still didn't solve the AF precission problems that they have ben having since the F-90X, at least this is my feeleng. The CCD is not as stable as one wold like, in a serial shot of photos not all photos come out exposed as you wold wish, not even in manual. In large exposures, the CCD heats up and makes an image that has noise (specles).
It doesen't con vince me it's saturation an contrast, I don't think that it is convinient to do a print without touching the photo with the photoshop, and aldo it has a good latitud on low lights, the high lights do... it looses detail very easely. In this aspect I think that you can compare any photo with a 800 ASA slide film. (personal opinion)
Anyway, I think that it is a good camera all in all, spetially dedicated for professionals that are use to the digital processes.

All photos are copyrighted and may not be used without permission from the photographer.
These photos are are a guide to what these cameras are capable of, but may not fully represent the camera due to post-processing, scanning, or photographic technique.
All brands are trademarked by their owners.
These pages are not sponsored or approved by the manufacturers.
Other content Copyright © 2003,2004,2005,2006, pbase.com LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Contact cameras@pbase.com to contribute data or photos of cameras.